same reason we have rotax light and heavy,light kids and heavy kids
nnett on December 5, 2009 at 22:29
Or maybe the kid's 6 foot 2 and is built to the brick shit house? Just because a kid weighs 80 kg doesn't necessarily mean he's obese. Also doesn't mean the kid should be excluded, I don't think.
arter on December 5, 2009 at 22:36
Why would we? From what I see, the majority of J-max drivers are tiny anyway
Clearly we aren't excluding them by keeping it all one weight, some are just disadvantaged, but I really feel it is a minority so I think it would be rather pointless.
nnett on December 5, 2009 at 22:45
I was just talking in general, I wouldn't know about j-max, lol.
The Junior high performnce class was always one weight, how many bigger kids missed out be cause they were just too big, and I don't mean FAT.
We will see with numbers if this class gets going.
Like all business' try to increase your customer base not LIMIT it.
I thought it was a joke when I read about this. Firstly, we don't have the amount of numbers in JMAX to add a heavy division (I think most will run the normal class). Secondly, what is this going to do to the rotax ranking scheme? They obviously can't win an overseas trip, because tthey dont run the class overseas, and if they actually do offer a trip for the winner, most of the guys are just gonna run the both classes, which i think will defeat the whole purpose (if there is one).
im around 6 foot 2 and weigh 65-66 hahahhaha but i still weigh 155 in a jmax :( maybe the engines need to go on a diet coz i know im not
Nathan Dunnett said:Or maybe the kid's 6 foot 2 and is built to the brick shit house? Just because a kid weighs 80 kg doesn't necessarily mean he's obese. Also doesn't mean the kid should be excluded, I don't think.
Comments7
same reason we have rotax…
same reason we have rotax light and heavy,light kids and heavy kids
nnett on December 5, 2009 at 22:29
Or maybe the kid's 6 foot 2 and is built to the brick shit house? Just because a kid weighs 80 kg doesn't necessarily mean he's obese. Also doesn't mean the kid should be excluded, I don't think.
arter on December 5, 2009 at 22:36
Why would we? From what I see, the majority of J-max drivers are tiny anyway
Clearly we aren't excluding them by keeping it all one weight, some are just disadvantaged, but I really feel it is a minority so I think it would be rather pointless.
nnett on December 5, 2009 at 22:45
I was just talking in general, I wouldn't know about j-max, lol.
The Junior high performnce class was always one weight, how many bigger kids missed out be cause they were just too big, and I don't mean FAT.
We will see with numbers if this class gets going.
Like all business' try to increase your customer base not LIMIT it.
I thought it was a joke when I read about this. Firstly, we don't have the amount of numbers in JMAX to add a heavy division (I think most will run the normal class). Secondly, what is this going to do to the rotax ranking scheme? They obviously can't win an overseas trip, because tthey dont run the class overseas, and if they actually do offer a trip for the winner, most of the guys are just gonna run the both classes, which i think will defeat the whole purpose (if there is one).
im around 6 foot 2 and weigh 65-66 hahahhaha but i still weigh 155 in a jmax :( maybe the engines need to go on a diet coz i know im not
Nathan Dunnett said:Or maybe the kid's 6 foot 2 and is built to the brick shit house? Just because a kid weighs 80 kg doesn't necessarily mean he's obese. Also doesn't mean the kid should be excluded, I don't think.